View Single Post
Old 04-29-2007, 01:09 PM   #46 (permalink)
tisonlyi
Nothing
 
tisonlyi's Avatar
 
"babies are altered for aesthetic reasons fairly often, if my understanding is correct from friends who work in delivery rooms. i can understand the genital mutilation argument on this issue, but its nothing to get all high and mighty about. removal of the foreskin doesn't change your dick that much; to compare it the genital removal rituals performed in africa or the like where they cut out the entire fucking clitoris or more is just asinine. as for the baby; have y'all ever been around babies? the ones i've been around have been fucking crying factories. my opinion that the circumcision / non-circumcision decision isn't the most paramount issue our children face isn't going to be swayed by a video of a baby crying; purely emotional play there."

For a definition of asinine, re-read your own text.

"removal of the foreskin doesn't change your dick that much" - ??? Insane. IF it doesn't change it that much, then why have your child put through agony to do it at all?

"to compare it the genital removal rituals performed in africa or the like where they cut out the entire fucking clitoris or more is just asinine." - where did i do that? I made a clear point comparing one aesthetic choice for skin removal to another, not clitoral removal. You upped the ante to try and ridicule the point. deliberate misdirection combined with an attack on me personally. well done. here's an ad hominem argument for you...

If you're in favour of child abuse, or even not against it, you're a child abuser.

If a procedure is performed on a child, a procedure which causes intense pain and permanent damage, for no sound medical reason then IT IS CHILD ABUSE.

"how do y'all feel if a parent elects to have something like a hairlip or birthmark removed when an infant is young? i was going to say cleft pallette work, but i think the old cleft pallette is a little more serious than the scope of dick surgery we're talking about. still, i don't know. i had a friends who left ear never fully unfolded when he was an infant, and his parents arranged to have it juked around with using a scapel and such to unfold it...for purely ascethic reasons. the guy was never upset at his parents for altering his natural appearance. i mean, maybe we're all sociologically brainwashed, but the fact that a bunch of guys who are cut...replying in this thread saying that we don't feel mentally and emotionally scarred...should be a reasonable indication that its not the heinous procedure that the uncut chaps are making it out to be."

cleft palette. hairline lip. disfigurements in general. serious deviations from 'the norm' which will radically affect the child's opportunities in later life.

Foreskin? How is that going to affect a person in their job interviews exactly?

"the... decision isn't the most paramount issue our children face and isn't going to be swayed by a video of a baby crying; purely emotional play there". I'm stunned. Human beings shouldn't let emotion come into our decisions as to whether babies should be mutilated or not. *shakes head*

Paramount concern? I'm sure the baby might not be worried about it's college fund at the time the clamp is attached...

Perhaps if you could translate the impulses overwhelming the newborn's nervous system into something in black and white, maybe then it'd be more cogent.

A baby is not a thing, not a lifestyle accessory to sculpt into whatever image you choose. It is a person. A defenceless person. A person who needs someone to protect it from harm. A person to love it.

Are you really looking after your baby if you're taking a knife to it for no good reason?

Seriously.

YOU ARE AMPUTATING A PERFECTLY GOOD PART OF A NEWBORN BABY'S ANATOMY FOR NO GOOD REASON.

Doesn't that make you think... err... maybe this isn't something i should do?

Really, if you don't see this as clear cut (pardon the pun) against, open and snip, err i mean shut, then you're deranged.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
tisonlyi is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360