Quote:
Originally Posted by host
ace.....the impeachment charges against Cheney are a cumulative reaction to things like.....this:
|
By the way I read Kucinich's third document and did not see any support for his case. I am not going any further, if someone saw somthing of importance, let me know.
Host,
I digest infomation in small bites. I am willing to go through your best stuff one item at a time. I will start with your first item. because I really want to understand the basis for these lies.
Quote:
.....Gloria Borger: Well, you know that Muhammad Atta the ringleader of the hijackers actually met with Iraqi intelligence.
Vice President Cheney: I know this. In Prague in April of this year as well as earlier. And that information has been made public. The Czechs made that public. Obviously that's an interesting piece of information.
|
Cheney seems to be responding to a question about Muhammad Atta meeting with Iraqi intelligence. He states that the information was made public by the Czechs. Is his statement a lie? did the questioner lie? did the Czechs lie? You posted something that links Cheney statements linking Atta and Iraq, but it does not prove a lie, we need more for this to serve as proof of a lie.
Quote:
Gloria Borger: Sounds like you have your suspicions?
Vice President Cheney: I can't operate on suspicions. The President and the rest of us who are involved in this effort have to make what we think are the right decisions for the United States and the national security arena and that's what we're doing. And it doesn't do a lot of good for us to speculate. We'd rather operate based on facts and make announcements when we've got announcements to make. .........
|
The questioner thinks Cheney has suspicions regarding the information released by the Czechs. He then says we can not operate on suspicions, and he goes on to distance himself from the information by saying "we'd rather operate based on facts and make announcements when when we've got announcements to make". I guess this "announcement" did not come from the White House.
Your first item fails to prove anything, in my view.
Please rebut and we can go to the next item.