Originally Posted by aceventura3

Out of the context of the flow of my exchange with Rekna, nothing.

I thought going after Clinton was a waste of government resources as was going after Libby. I think government should focus on things that matter to and have an impact on most of Americans. The political tit-for-tat appears as if it will never end.

How do you figure I "hate" Clinton? Just because I asked a question involving an issue during his time in office? If that is the test - it seems any reference to history is off limits. I don't accept that, so think what you will.

In our history many have been found guilty of crimes, when the charges were politically motivated. A guilty verdict does not make that kind of thing right.

There are double standards, involving both parties. I see it. Do you?

I don't resent or hate Clinton. In-fact, I doubt you could find a negative word ever written by me about Bill Clinton. So WTF are you talking about?

How about reading what I write before making attacks. I know it is easier to argue with stuff you make up. But if you want to make stuff up, don't use me.