then I'm extremely confused by your position. What I'm reading is that you believe the dissenting opinion is most logically correct because the 2nd Amendment hasn't been incorporated in to the 14th, yet DC is not a state so it could never be applied to it anyway, but how does that work with the other amendments being applied to DC, since it is not a state?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|