Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
It's sad that the local police are so inept/corrupt/etc. that they cannot protect whitenesses. What should be going on is a magnifying glass on the police, who's job it is to protect citizens, like the whitenesses, from criminals. If they have any indication that a whiteness might be in danger, then you do what you can to protect them. Post a car outside their home. Make sure they stay in public areas (if the whiteness complains, they might do well to be reminded that their life is in danger). Do what's necessary to get their job done. If they need more money, then all they need to do is show the fatality rate of whitenesses and they should get what's necessary to keep people safe.
|
I don't think that the police have a problem protecting the whitnesses. It's the
blacknesses that they seem to running into problems protecting.
Sorry...it was there. I had to take it.
Will...real life is not as simple as a one hour TV police drama. Manpower is strained, and the paperwork alone is staggering. Even on a simple bust. It boggles the average mind, believe me.
And, when was the magnifyng glass ever
off of the police? No other profession is more highly scrutinized. None.
As far as getting what's necessary to keep people safe...they aren't getting that
now. The general public would scream bloody murder, and justifiably so, at the cost of placing police presence on every single street corner...which is what it would take.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Can we have a combined thread for gun control please?
|
Ummm...no. Just as there will be no combined thread for Bush bashing.
Look...I know that many of dksuddeth's posts and threads center around the topic of gun control. You'd be a blithering fool not to see it. But, it's obviously an issue that he feels strongly about. He has the right (albeit annoying at times) to voice his opinion. I seem to recall many upon many of your posts randomly bashing Bush, and asking myself: "What the hell does
that have to do with the price of stock shares in China?". See what I mean?
And, dksuddeth...if you are following this, and I know that you are, then take a little friendly advice. Find a couple of other causes to champion. Round yourself out a bit. If you didn't try to inject your second amendment views every single chance that you possibly get...you might actually reach more people with your message. Think...Evangelical, or Fundamentalist. Y'know how annoying, and off turning, they can be? Make sense, now?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Astrocloud
The Prosecutors office is part of law enforcement. This isn't a novel concept -if the police are arresting someone on Monday and the prosecutors office is releasing them on Tuesday -then the problem lays with law enforcement. This is patently clear from the article if it is read in it's entirety.
|
NOW I see the problem. NO...no...no. The Prosecutor's Office is
not part of law enforcement. Good God, man...don't
ever say that to a cop. The Prosecutor's Office is part of the judicial system...that's all. The only lawyer that a cop hates worse than a DA, is a defense attorney.
I can, however, see where one could make that mistake. I guess, on
some level, it makes sense. But it's akin to saying that dogs and cats are canines. They may both be
animals, but not all canines. I'm tired and not making sense anymore, I know.