Sometimes things here strike me as so messed up, that I admit to resorting to sarcasm as a first response. It's akin to nervous laughter I guess. I was probably right on the money regardless.
There are LIGHT YEARS of psychological difference between nudity for informational purposes and sexual education, and a 9 year old girl watching mom getting it doggystyle by the boyfriend, who for all we know is one of many she has, and at the very least is unmarried. What kind of role model is this woman to her young daughter? I have nothing at all against a young girl learning about reproduction in the proper context, and trust me I'm the last person to think sex is 'dirty', but there's nothing positive or educational going on here.
A 9 year old girl already has so much going on in her mind emotionally: peer pressure, fitting in, discovering the meaning of sex itself, discovering her own sexuality, the meaning of love, the attainment of her own self-respect, the meaning of reproduction, periods, strong emotional feelings of affection for boys (or girls), self discipline, issues of sexual aggression, issues of STDs, etc. A 9 year old girl has very little understanding of the concept of reproduction, let alone the concept of recreational sex. If she sees her mother - her role model - having sex in front of her, she's going to want to try it herself. We approve of 9 year olds having sex do we? And what kind of fucked up pervert adult male would enjoy or approve of having sex in front of a child? I suppose some of you people also think its ok for a guy to jerk off in front of a little girl, eh? Or maybe not so much so, if mom is doing it for him. This is Jerry Springer shit, people.
I'm sure decent, responsible adults at any time in history went to great lengths to seek out a bit of privacy while engaged in sex with children around. I'm amazed I even have to explain myself on this.
