View Single Post
Old 01-19-2007, 02:03 PM   #14 (permalink)
jorgelito
All important elusive independent swing voter...
 
jorgelito's Avatar
 
Location: People's Republic of KKKalifornia
Jazz, one main difference between the US-USSR binary and the US-China one is that the economies of US-China are much more closely tied. US action in China would yield a Pyrrhic victory in that the US could potentially destroy much of it's own and allies' factories, companies etc. Likewise, disrupting US economy is NOT beneficial to China either so they have even less incentive to attack.

No, I think one has to look at the regional context first. What is China most concerned with?

Mostly, to not be attacked so it takes on a mostly defensive posture.

Second, to make sure Taiwan does not declare independence nor have any other country interfere there. Most of China's military strategy involves national defense and the Taiwan Scenario.

Thirdly, China wants to reclaim its former glory and prestige by being recognized as the dominant regional power and a global power as well.

While it is true that China is actively seeking to modernize and improve its military capability, one has to look at it's function to understand the motive.
a. China wants a better navy, a "blue water" navy rather than be the coast guard that it is now. Why the projection of naval power? To protect its shipping lanes, specifically the Straights of Malacca where most of China's imported oil flows through. China is concerned because of the large US naval presence there. Basically, China is trying to protect it's resources. Secondly, to better "deal" with the Taiwan issue. Until China improves its navy, especially amphibious assault and landing, invading Taiwan is just a pipe dream.

b. China knows that it is 50 years behind in military power. At best, it may reach 20 years behind. So China has to develop a different strategy. Recent defensive white papers show that China is looking to reduce its standing army and traditional formation in favor of more slim, sleek and flexible fighting units. Cyber warfare and other "assassin" style tactics are now the goal. So updating computer command and control is the Chinese goal for updating its military.

The context of a post Cold war, Post-9/11 globalized economy is also different than the Cold War era. I don't think there is much of a parallel there.
jorgelito is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360