View Single Post
Old 01-11-2007, 03:56 PM   #28 (permalink)
dc_dux
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
I see the Iraqi war the same way. Democrats gave Bush the authority to use force. As soon as he did, they started bitching and complaining. The difference is that the bitching and complaining gives comfort to the enemy making things more difficult. At this point Democrats need to shut the f*** up and help row.
I wonder how many Republicans will not shut the f*** up and will join with the majority of the country and stop "rowing".
Quote:
Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE)
I think what the president said last night — and I listened carefully and read through it again this morning — is all about a broadened American involvement — escalation — in Iraq and the Middle East. I do not agree with that escalation.

And I would further note that when you say, as you have here this morning, that we need to address and help the Iraqis and pay attention to the fact that Iraqis are being killed, Madam Secretary, Iraqis are killing Iraqis. We are in a civil war. This is sectarian violence out of control; Iraqi on Iraqi.

Worst, it is inner-sectarian violence; Shia killing Shia.

To ask our young men and women to sacrifice their lives to be put in the middle of a civil war is wrong.

It’s, first of all, in my opinion, morally wrong. It’s tactically, strategically, militarily wrong.

So, Madam Secretary, when you set in motion the kind of policy that the president is talking about here, it’s very, very dangerous. As a matter of fact, I have to say, Madam Secretary, that I think this speech given last night by this president represents the most dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam — if it’s carried out.

I will resist it.
***
Sen. Norm Coleman (R, MN)
“[Coleman] said today after a two-day trip to Iraq that he would not support an increase in the number of soldiers in Baghdad. He said he would ’stand against’ any effort to send a surge of more troops to Baghdad unless there’s a clear vision that it will help end sectarian violence in the city. ‘I think it would create more targets. I think we would put more life at risk,’ he said.”
***
Sen. Kit Bond (R, MO)
“What good is that going to do? I have seen nothing so far that would push me to think a surge is a good idea.”
***
Sen. Susan Collins (R, ME)
“‘I don’t think the addition of new American troops in a situation plagued by sectarian strife is the answer,’ Collins said. ‘I think more American troops will present more American targets.’
***
Sen. Gordon Smith (R, OR)
“I, for one, am at the end of my rope when it comes to supporting a policy that has our soldiers patrolling the same streets in the same way being blown up by the same bombs day after day. That is absurd. It may even be criminal. I cannot support that any more. I believe we need to figure out not just how to leave Iraq but how to fight the War on Terror and to do it right.”
***
Sen. Olympia Snowe (R, ME)
“After almost a year, the Iraqi government has yet to disarm the militias, establish oil revenue sharing or conduct provincial elections,” said Sen. Olympia Snowe, a Republican, in an e-mailed statement.
Snowe added: “We should not place more American servicemen and women in harm’s way to instill a peace that the Iraqis are not willing to seek for themselves.”
***
Sen. George Voinovich (R, OH)
“At this point I am skeptical that a surge in troops alone will bring an end to sectarian violence and the insurgency that is fomenting instability in Iraq,” Voinovich said. “The generals who have served there do not believe additional troops alone will help. And my faith in Prime Minister al-Maliki’s political will to make the hard choices necessary to bring about a political solution is fragile at best.
***
Sen. John Warner (R, VA)
“An ‘undefined surge concept is one that I would have to see a lot of strong rationale before I could support it,’ said Sen. John Warner, R-Va., the former Senate Armed Services Committee chairman. ...the former chairman also paraphrased the testimony of Army Gen. John Abizaid, the commander of all U.S. forces in the region, before the committee last November, stating that the general did not believe that additional U.S. troops in Iraq would necessarily help the situation on the ground.”
Perhaps the "rowing" should be more aptly described as "flapping their arms in the wind", risking more American lives and getting nowhere

"The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind"
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 01-11-2007 at 04:03 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360