View Single Post
Old 11-21-2006, 09:58 PM   #25 (permalink)
analog
Banned
 
Quote:
Bob Sullivan [...] said of the report: "Frankly, it's a disgrace. To put in, as the cause, alcohol and nothing else, is unbelievable."
But that's what caused her death. Yes, she fell down under the train. If she'd stayed where she was, and not gone crawling around ON THE TRACKS, she'd most certainly have been fine. The gap where she fell had a STOPPED train on its tracks, and wasn't going to be moving immediately. They told her not to let go, but she crawled across a track, she got hit and died. Yes, it sucks, but she was drunk and didn't listen, and it cost her her life- that is not the fault of the railroad company.

Quote:
Sullivan also questioned the New York City medical examiner's toxicology test cited in the report, which said Smead had a blood alcohol level of .23 percent. The blood-alcohol test was performed 90 minutes after Smead was struck by the train, according to the report. Smead received 9 pints of blood at Bellevue Hospital, Sullivan said. It is unclear whether the test was done before or after she received the blood.
Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) is a percentage-based number, and would not be affected if the patient LOST blood. If the patient had been GIVEN blood, that would only make the BAC lower, not higher... and 0.23% BAC is very high by itself... consider that a lot of states deem 0.08% "impaired" for the purposes of designating "driving under the influence". 0.23% would mess anyone up, let alone an 18 year old skinny enough to fall through a 7 7/8" gap.

I'd also point out the obvious fact that the legal drinking age in the US is 21, not 18.

"This certainly was a tragic and terrible accident and our heartfelt condolences go out to Ms. Smead's family..." Madison (Thomas Madison Jr., board chairman and commissioner of the state Department of Transportation) said. "We can do everything in our power to make sure that a system is safe and reliable, but there is always that variable of personal responsibility that's involved in these circumstances."

YES!!! I'm so glad he articulated that point. There is that variable of personal responsibility- very well put.
analog is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360