|
Exactly Pain Train, I don't mind the parts of the bans and attitudes and such that are there for the protection of others. I know that smoke trapped inside a building is just going to stick around and force carcinogens into the lungs of everyone regardless of their choice to smoke or not, so I don't argue with that.
I'm going to take this to the other side where as Infinite Loser can't understand why smokers are still arguing for their right to smoke, I can't believe that non-smokers, after winning the part of the argument that pertains to their own health, are fighting for the right to legislate behavior based on no other criteria other than I find it annoying. If we're gonna go there, I want a 'you can't pick your nose in you car law' I mean really, lets talk disgusting to look at for a bit here why don't we?
Get it non-smokers? You've convinced many of us that we need to take it outside. YOU WON THE SAFETY ISSUE. There is no need to keep going on about safety. Please try to actually defend the restrictions on us smoking OUTSIDE, where the second hand smoke killing you argument is really quite moot. I would really like to see a reasonable deffense on this one, I need that to understand why it seems no matter what ground I'm willing to give I'm being asked for more.
__________________
~~^~<@Xera @>~^~~
"A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing." ~Erno Philips
|