Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
I don't get it, Host. Are you saying that the election should have been a Democratic landslide, but since it was a Democratic victory by such a small margin, that it was because of voting machine tampering? "Cause, seriously...if you meant anything else, it went right the hell over my head.
|
to clarify....I simply meant that it is absurd, IMO, to conclude that the background story of the HBO docu, "Hacking Democracy", the spectacle of former Diebold CEO being a Bush "pioneer", and publicly committing to deliver the 2004, Ohio vote "to president Bush", the spectacle of brothers
Quote:
Two voting companies & two brothers will count 80 percent of U.S. ...Meet the Urosevich brothers, Bob and Todd. Their respective companies, Diebold and ES&S, will count (using both computerized ballot scanners and touchscreen ...
http://www.onlinejournal.com/evoting...804landes.html - 34k -
|
....and of Chuck Hagel not disclosing, for the first ten weeks of his '96 senate campaign, that he was still CEO of a major electronic voting vendor, and later, that he was a principle in the private holding company that still owned that e-voting vendor.....is "move along now, folks....nothing to see here".! Just watch the google video that I linked to "Hacking Democracy", and then explain why Cuyahoga county in Ohio, would choose to spend $22 million on Diebold scanning e-voting systems, after the hearing excerpts shown in that documentary.....how could they reach a decision like that, with what they were told in advance about the deficiencies in what Diebold was offering?
....absurd that a slim margin victory in a mid-term election for senate in just a few states, would lead to Seaver asking his question, in the serious way that he asked it.....especially with all of the reasons that voters had to vote more defninitively.