Quote:
Originally Posted by Seaver
So now that the Dems won...
....
... what was that about Diebold?
|
Seaver...does it seem that far out of the realm of possibility that the reported results are in spite of attempts to suppress the expected backlash in reaction to the situations in Iraq and in Afghanistan, the dismantling of the US agreement with N. Korea/UN inspection program that accelerated the bomb grade uranium enrichment by at least a decade, a $3000 billion new treasury debt burden, in just five years, an assault on constitutional rights, due process, habeus corpus, domestic right to privacy, SCOTUS appointments of extreme right justices, the Colbert emcee performance at the annual white house press corp dinner, Helen Thomas's peristant and courageous press gaggle/conference questions, the renewed white house "agenda to "reform" SSI, the Abramoff related congressional arrests and resignations, the indictment of VP COS Libby, 800+ signing statements, the unrelenting terrorizing of the country by the POTUS and the VP....the failure to capture bin Laden, admission that there were no Iraqi WMD or active WMD development programs, Cindy Sheehan's activities next to Bush's ranch and his reaction to her......that's a brief and incomplete recap...of just some of the negatives, since Nov., 2004.....did I mention Foleygate....or the division of Phase II of Pat Robert's senate select intel committee report related to the administration's treatment of pre-Iraq war intelligence....now divided into five smaller "phases".....with the four most damaging phases delayed since July, 2004......
.....and you think that a vote result this close....is convincing "proof" that there was no problem, after all....with the integrity, reliability, and security of electronic voting software, and equipment.....do you.....really?