Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
When you said that it was a trait that would be lost over time.
|
This still doesn't explain how and where I said that homosexuality was relatively new.
Quote:
|
So then we agree that homosexuality is probably a natural way to deal with overpopulation. Natural. Normal. Acceptable. Even usefull.
|
No. This has been proven true in animals; It has yet to be seen in humans. I won't even get into the fact that homosexuality in humans has been documented long before the issue of overcrowding ever became the central topic of debate. In regions where there is severe overcrowding, you would expect homosexuality to be more prevalent than in regions with less people per square mile/kilometer, but this simply isn't the case. In fact, it's almost the opposite. Did you know that a large portion of homosexuality in humans occurs in regions which aren't considered to be overcrowded?
Quote:
|
I hope you have a link or citation to support that. How do you know that homosexuality doesn't only appear or become more prevalant when a population becomes to big? The current population, 300,000,000 people in the US alone, is CLEARLY overpopulation. And there are more homosexual people in larger cities.
|
Wait... The United States is the third largest country by landmass and the third largest by population. The fact is that the United States
doesn't even rank at the top of the most densely populated countries of the world yet we have one of the highest occurances of homosexuality. Please explain to me how this fits into your "Population control" theory?
Quote:
|
If that were so, how did I formulate arguments against you? You can't argue with truth, but you sure as hell can argue with flawed logic.
|
Simple answer: You didn't
