Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Erm... When did I say that homosexuality was a new concept?
|
When you said that it was a trait that would be lost over time.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Did you not read any of my responses thus far? I said this once before, but I'll say it again. I believe it's been a few years, but scientists conducting an experiment to see when, and if, homosexuality occurs in a population. They first did it with mice and then with monkeys. It was observed that homosexuality occurs only when space became an issue; When a portion of the population died off, then they went back to being heterosexual.
|
So then we agree that homosexuality is probably a natural way to deal with overpopulation. Natural. Normal. Acceptable. Even usefull.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Homosexuality in humans doesn't just occur in situations of overpopulization nor is a particularly effective means of population control in humans, either. The difference between humans and animals is that, unlike animals which are driven by mear instinct, humans are able to rationalize and can thusly make choices. If homosexuality were genetic, then it would only manifest itself when it's needed and at the times it's needed, much like in animals. Of course, it doesn't.
|
I hope you have a link or citation to support that. How do you know that homosexuality doesn't only appear or become more prevalant when a population becomes to big? The current population, 300,000,000 people in the US alone, is CLEARLY overpopulation. And there are more homosexual people in larger cities.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Oh! And it's not a simplistic form of Darwinism. It's the cold, hard truth.
|
If that were so, how did I formulate arguments against you? You can't argue with truth, but you sure as hell can argue with flawed logic.