Quote:
Originally Posted by NCB
Look, what some homosexual does in the bedroom is their biz. Marriage, however, is asking for federal benefits. The idea behind these benefits is the advancement of a stable family situation. While this is certainly no guarantee in a normal relationship, it's a possibility. A homosexual relationship can not reproduce, ever. It is not naturally intended that they do so. You are asking the federal government to basically fork over dollars for a sexual proclivity. Homosexuals are not a race. It's like declaring special rights to S&M practitioners. Shack up, cool. As others have said, however, tax dollars should not go to fund a non-productive sexual orientation.
|
Then should we deny federal benefits to the hundreds of thousands of heterosexual couples who do not have children?
__________________
If I am not better, at least I am different. --Jean-Jacques Rousseau
|