Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JinnKai
Of all the assumptions one could attack in the OP, no one bothered with this one? Are you fuckin' kidding me? This is absolutely, verifiably, patently, completely, utterly, entirely, enormously, FALSE
YOU CANT FUCKING RUN A CAR ON WATER WITHOUT EXPENDING MORE FOSSIL FUELS IN CHARGING THE BATTERY.
It's thermo-fucking-dynamics for crissake and I'm tired of hearing this "we can run everything on water" GARBAGE.
To create one joule of energy stored as H2 and O2 requires more than 1 joule of electricity. It doesn't matter where you get that 1 joule of electricity (solar cells, gasoline, hydroelectric...) you still loose some energy in the process. AND YOU'RE STILL DEPENDENT ON THE OTHER FUEL SOURCE.
|
Dude, too much caffine. Take a deep breath...
...in their lifetimes, solar pannels give off thousands to hundreds of thousands of times the energy units it took to creat them in the first place, right? Electricity is all it takes to turn water into hydrogen, right? (Electrolysis). So the only fossuil fuels needed to make a car run on water could be those used to creat solar panels and batteries, both of which could be created with solar power. The whole process could exist without the need for fossil fuels.
Solar panel takes in sunlight, converts to electricity, stores in battery, electricity from battery is run through water until the H20 molecules break apart and create hydrogen and oxygen, both of which are highly combustable and more efficient than gasoline or diesel.
Conclusion: you're wrong, and not only that, you're wrong and your shouting, and not only that but you're wrong and you contracidt yourself:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jinnkai
YOU CANT FUCKING RUN A CAR ON WATER WITHOUT EXPENDING MORE FOSSIL FUELS IN CHARGING THE BATTERY.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jinnkai
It doesn't matter where you get that 1 joule of electricity (solar cells, gasoline, hydroelectric...
|
What gives?