First about the OP.
When you look at what governments have invested in oil, you realize they aren't going to look for something cheaper. Not necessarily because the leaders are oil people but the taxes, the commodity itself.
As for Iraq, we went in there for numerous reasons only known to W and his people. There was no immediate or future threat from him and we dropped the ball on the 2 countries that are truly more able to hurt us.... Iran and N. Korea. So obviously there is a hidden agenda there.
My opinion is that perhaps, if that area blows up and we go into a major war, we control Iraq's oil and set up a nice wall between Syria and Iran. Where we could handle Iran and Isreal could take out Syria without Iran or Syria able to help one another.
The war also works in keeping the nationm divided and thus have "bigger issues" to deal with than oil and energy.
Now as an aside:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I do not accept your assumptions and therefore can not answer your question.
|
Sooooo you had to type that you are not accepting his assumptions and refuse to answer, why?????
Are you the fucking king of posting and therefore have to pass judgement on all posts.
Simply moving on and not posting would be the more considerate thing. Especially since your next post contained nothing but quotes:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
#1
#2
#3
|
How deliciously simple minded, egotistical and flatly self superior. I do question though that if you are so superior, why you have to even tell people that a certain thread isn't worth your time......
Ahhhh Us2 you are truly nothing but a load of hot air who claims superiority yet shows nothing.
Me, see I dislike egotists and people who act like they are better.... Right now I am no better than what I accuse you of but..... you know, I like to point these things out..... makes me feel better and shows me at least why you aren't really worth debating. You're great at the hit and run and trying to get into people's minds and push buttons.... back to ignore with you.....