pan: what makes you think that positioning yourself between the two american conservative parties is an act that in any way "betters the country"?
seriously--i made an argument that both parties are incoherent, that opposition to both can be understood as an act meant (at the level of intention at least) of engendering a wholly different type of conversation than you have now---but you decide, for whatever reason, that working for the better means one thing and that is your thing.
why is that?
if the framework is incoherent, what good comes of sitting around in a circle trying to like each other at the middle of it?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|