What I find particularly interesting is the "armchair presidents" we have. ANYBODY can sit there AFTER the fact and say "Bush shouldn't have done this...." "Clinton shouldn't have done that...." But in all reality, I think they do the best that they can do, with the INFORMATION THEY ARE PROVIDED. Who here KNEW for a FACT that there we no WMD? NOBODY in here can say they knew it for sure.... Who in here can say that a President is not held to a higher standard than anyone else? (I am refering to Clinton and his impeachment/Monica Lewinski scandal) and that when they are President, that EVERYTHING they do will be scrutinized under a microscope?
As far as I am concerned, if you are the President, I expect you to be able to provide answers to your actions, regardless of what your actions are. As President, you are held responsable for everything that happens during your term...even IF it is a direct result of improper information.
I don't support EVERYTHING that Bush is doing, but I believe he did the best he could, and nobody can say anyone else would have done any better in his place...we don't know, and we never will know. Life is cause and circumstance....
I get humour out of this though..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by justjess
Bush is worse in my opinion because he's even stupider
|
Is "stupider" even a word?...lol..Don't take this as an insult Justjess, It is only meant in humour, but to say someone is stupider, makes the poster look like they failed grammer class ...lol. (PLEASE take this in jest, I am not being mean, or insulting anyone..just always thought that word was funny...not to mention the times I have mispelled or misused a word!)