First of all,
Quote:
Quote:
|
...rather than figure out how to evenly distribute the wealth in this country...
|
...a problem?
|
Let me ask you something j8ear. Do you see anywhere in this debate, anything even remotely bringing that up, and defending it? Do you see any link between that statement and the arguments in this thread? If you'd like to talk about that then make another thread; if your just going to throw it in as some benine argument to show that my points are in some way based on that statement, then you can pm me and spare the rest of these people.
I agree with Seaver, and roachboy.
Have some of you even been reading the other posts?
Quote:
Originally posted by Ch'i
¶Among taxpayers with incomes greater than $10 million, the amount by which their investment tax bill was reduced averaged about $500,000 in 2003, and total tax savings, which included the two Bush tax cuts on compensation, nearly doubled, to slightly more than $1 million.
¶These taxpayers, whose average income was $26 million, paid about the same share of their income in income taxes as those making $200,000 to $500,000 because of the lowered rates on investment income.
|
The point was made a looonnnggg time ago, get over it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
something is obviously wrong if the conservative set cannot manage a serious debate even in a thread framed in its own peculiar language.
|