View Single Post
Old 09-08-2006, 12:30 PM   #43 (permalink)
Seaver
Junkie
 
Seaver's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
How did this turn into this?

The point was made that the Bush tax cuts were for the rich. The facts were everyone had a % cut, so those who paid more would pay only fractionally less.

Quote:
The Congressional Budget Office did an analyis of the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003. Among the findings:

* The bottom 20 percent of Americans will see their after-tax incomes increase by an average of 1.5 percent due to the Bush tax cuts, while the tax cuts will raise the after-tax income of the middle 60 percent by about 2 percent, on average.

* Those in the top 20 percent will enjoy larger after-tax income gains, with after-tax income increasing 3.3 percent due to the tax cuts. The top one percent will see its after-tax income grow by an average of 5.3 percenr, more than double the percentage increase enjoyed by the middle class.
I really want to see this. While those who pay less taxes would obviously get less for their % back, I dont see how it can be 1.5x when both groups get the same fraction back.
__________________
"Smite the rocks with the rod of knowledge, and fountains of unstinted wealth will gush forth." - Ashbel Smith as he laid the first cornerstone of the University of Texas
Seaver is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52