Quote:
Originally Posted by host
Il professore's "article" is a little long for my taste, I'd rather concentrate on my lunch here, and the delicious grammy bears that my wife tossed in for my dessert treat.
I'm certainly not going to read the whole thing....I read the leftist drivel that Mr. Mephisto posted, and that's enough for one day.
These new threads have already become a tiresome pattern, and unworthy of debate. I'm sure the first thing that went through most tfp leftwingers minds today wasn't 'I'm glad they got that Israel damaged the terrorists' ability to attack it's civilians with six more years of random rocket attacks, but 'good ! this will hurt Bush politically'. I was waiting for a conspiracy post, and we got it. This time it involves an unverifiable attack by a "hack" journalist against the two governments doing the most in the world today, to advance the GWOT.
No difference between this article and what gets posted in paranoia.
|
Typical rightwing response... not reading the whole article
Although those tossed grammy bears sound delicious, your argument is stale (maybe it was left out too long). I don't remember praising needless civilian casualties as being one of the characteristics of a "leftist"; probably Bush's fault for keeping me from my studies.
It's not conspiracy to point out suspicious behavior. Normally the best thing you can do is to question, and suspect; that's how we came up with our new security for airports that makes me feel so much safer at night.
Paranoid, no. Curious, yes.