Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
The draft legislation cites the goal of ensuring fair treatment without unduly diverting military personnel from wartime assignments to present evidence in trials.
That doesn't 'jive' if this applies to domestic cases. I want more proof of who this applies to then 'civilians'. If it does apply to US citizens then it will be struck down.
|
This particular statement should give anyone pause,
The U.S. official countered that a military judge "would look hard" at the origins of such evidence and that defendants would have to count on "the trustworthiness of the system."
I could be mistaken, but isn't this what jury trials were supposed to correct before our little revolution?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|