Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Because you may not like an explanation does not make it false. When you think of the 100's of people who would have to be 'in' on 9/11 if the conspiracy theories were true and yet all we have are theories from people who are not experts but in fact unqualified to make their assumptions, the rational mind must assume that the rational and unrefuted explanation is the valid one. Event the theories don't support each other, its more of a shotgun approach where someone hopes something will stick.
|
So the amount of people in on a conspiracy is a good measure of it's likelyhood? How many people do you suppose knew about Watergate? How many people do you suppose knew or even know about the Kennedy assasination? For that matter, how many people know the difference between bites and bytes? 8 Mb per second download is about .95 MB per second download. That's a conspiracy to cover up the real download speed of your internet, btw.
Experts have come foraward from both sides (like global warming about 20 years ago) and some have been discredited - on both sides. The problem with the 9/11 truth movement is that there is no one explaination, and there never will be one until the ultimate truth is revealed. Some of us think that thermite charges were used, others don't. Some of us think the planes that crashed were drones, some of us don't. Some of us think that the passengers were real and some don't. There will be no concensus until more facts are uncovered. Remember, most of the stuff we have to go on is 5 years old, and new information on the subject, besides a few lame hollywood movies, is rare to say the least.