Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
This is you 'spinning'.
|
Not a refutation.
Quote:
|
This is you spinning faster.
|
still no refutation.
Quote:
|
And this is where you've spun completely out of control.
|
Still nothing to counter any of my arguments (because there is no counter that will fly logically), but you sure are managing to be rude as hell aren't you? That's a GREAT way to get people to see things your way. Insult them, and I'm sure they'll all immediately convert to your cause.
Quote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Kindly point out where it says you NEED to be in a well regulated militia to have a gun. If you CAN, then we know who's inventing imaginary exclusions.
|
Kindly inform us as to why they would mention a well-regulated militia if it didn't have SOMETHING to do with the bit about bearing arms.
Quote:
|
We've had this conversation before. I theoretically proved it could be done.
|
No, you didn't. You indulged in a wildassed fantasy and then got upset when noone believed you.
Quote:
|
It's being proven in the real world today, as we type.
|
Where would that be?
Quote:
|
blah blah blah blah blah. Once again you've spun out of control.
|
And once again you're replacing logical, well thought out - hell even partially thought out - arguments with being a jerk. That's certainly no way to convince anyone.
Quote:
|
Is this how you win arguments face to face? take a logical argument or point from someone, stand it on its ear, then call it illogical poorly conceived, and tell that person he's nuts? tsk tsk.
|
You might have a point there if your arguments were grounded with logic in the first place. And I have yet to say that you're nuts.