Thread: fifth amendment
View Single Post
Old 06-22-2006, 07:34 AM   #20 (permalink)
aceventura3
Junkie
 
aceventura3's Avatar
 
Location: Ventura County
According to this article in IBD, in the year after Kelo many 25 states have passed law curbing eminent domain abuse. However, there is an important case being heard in Ohio.

Quote:
Property Owners Win And Lose In Year After Kelo Case Ruling

BY BRIAN MITCHELL

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Posted 6/21/2006

One year after the Supreme Court's landmark decision in the Kelo case, the government's power of eminent domain is facing its first major legal challenge — in a much-changed political environment.

The Ohio Supreme Court is expected to rule any day in a case from suburban Cincinnati that could signal whether state courts will follow federal courts in favoring local governments over individual property owners.

"It will be a real indication as to which way the state courts may go," said Scott Bullock, an attorney with the Institute for Justice, a public-interest law firm that defends property owners against eminent domain.

"Even the Supreme Court, in the majority opinion in Kelo, recognized and almost invited state courts to come to different conclusions than what the Supreme Court did," Bullock said.

Governments have long claimed the right to take private property to build roads, dams, parks and other public facilities.

But since the urban renewal efforts of the mid-20th century, cities have claimed the right to take private property in poor condition for redevelopment by other owners.

The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, Conn., affirmed that right, ruling economic growth can qualify as "public use" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

The decision, issued a year ago Friday, sparked outrage across the nation and moved state and local lawmakers to pass laws curbing eminent domain abuse.

In the past year, 25 states have enacted such laws. Three more states need only the governor's signature for measures to become law.

But local governments also have moved against many more property owners, according to the Institute for Justice.

"The threat of eminent domain has soared in the past year," said IJ attorney Dana Berliner. "Cities feel empowered by the decision, and they are using it to charge ahead, threatening eminent domain for private development and acquiring property throughout the country."

Nationwide, Berliner tallied 5,783 properties either threatened with seizure or condemned for redevelopment since the Kelo decision.

That's two and a half times the average annual rate of 2,056 properties threatened or condemned from 1998 to 2002, according to IJ.

Cities are threatening eminent domain more, but filing to condemn and seize property less.

Berliner says more property owners since Kelo either believe they have no choice but to go along or are seeking legislative relief instead of fighting it out in court.

In Norwood, Ohio, 66 neighborhood property owners accepted buyout offers from a developer wanting to build a $125 million retail, residential and office complex.

But five refused to sell and sued to keep their properties when the city condemned the neighborhood as "deteriorating" and in danger of becoming "blighted."

"Private property rights groups make the argument that it's property owner versus government," said Lora Lucero, attorney for the American Planning Association.

"We think that's a false dichotomy," she said. "It's really the property owner, the neighbors, the community and the government."

Two of the holdouts dropped out when lower courts ruled against them. But three appealed to the state Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments in January.

The three holdouts have already been evicted, and the land around their lots has already been leveled.

The Institute for Justice represents the holdouts. Fourteen groups filed amicus briefs on their behalf, representing realtors, farmers, minorities, churches and small businesses.

Seven groups filed on the city's behalf, representing city planners, developers and local governments.

In 1953, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled "the power of eminent domain may not be exercised merely or primarily to take private property for private purposes."

The question today, post Kelo, is whether Ohio justices will see the taking as "merely or primarily . . . for private purposes" if the planned project adds the estimated $2 million to city revenue.

According to a new Minneapolis Federal Reserve study, taking private property for other private use is economically "counterproductive." The authors urged the Supreme Court to reconsider Kelo.
http://www.investors.com/editorial/I...issue=20060621
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."

aceventura3 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360