View Single Post
Old 06-19-2006, 04:16 AM   #24 (permalink)
maleficent
Junkie
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: Chicago
Quote:
Originally Posted by hulk
You're just asking to foot the bill for massive cosmetic surgery, quadraplegics, comatose patients. Bad idea.
So if we just have people wandering around with a shot gun and kill the people who wipe out on their bikes and eliminite the whole - living for years in a vegatative state at the taxpayers expense - the problem is solved right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hulk
hey're not the only ones affected - their friends, their families have to deal with the pain involved.
Not a good reason for the government saying they shoudl wear a helmet, they shoudl wear a helmet for their own good... because they want to protect themselves... and perhaps their loved ones...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlatan
I wouldn't be surprised to see insurance companies add caveats that if the rider is determined to not have been wearing a helmet then they aren't covered. This would be the equivalent action.
A motorcycle, like any other vehicle, has to be insured... if a person chooses to not wear a helmet, then they should have higher insurance rates for the motocycle.
__________________
Free your heart from hatred. Free your mind from worries. Live simply. Give more. Expect less.

Last edited by maleficent; 06-19-2006 at 04:18 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
maleficent is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73