|
Without getting to in depth into legal premises or precedents, I think that this is a joke. Just seems to me that one of the motivating factors for both the foundation of our country, and overall as a precept of philosophical/political thought, is private property. It is beyond my limited understanding of their ruling how they can vote for something that seems to strip the people of the right to property, and at the same time allow a law to stand that is so easily corruptable. Developments are taking over the world. I should go read the case briefing.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
|