Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cj2112
Yes of course, because electing a democrat is MUCH more important than electing somebody who will actually make a stand for our constitutional rights
|
Anybody can cut and paste another member's statement and add a one sentence question below it, as you did....
Please share your proposal for a reasonable likelihood of wresting control of one house of congress from the republican majority, by any other means than voting for democratic candidates who campaign for offices now held by republicans, and by voting for incumbant democrats. I don't see an alternative that isn't clouded by idealism or is realistic. Change my mind...but don't tell me that there is any priority greater than removing republicans from control of one house of congress, ASAP. There will be no hearings, no changes, no accountability until a change in control happens. Your disdain for democrats is not misplaced. Now, however, they are our last best hope...the lesser of two evils, at this time.
Divide the hold on power, fragment it...give the democrats some means to challenge, expose, and circumvent the republicans, then....back some alternative candidates...after the 2008 presidential election, then vote for whoever you think will best represent you. But.....now...the immediate goal must be to fragment the power concentration of republicans in Washington.