Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
LINK
A.) I hold that it should be the pursu ee should be held liable...not the pursu er.
B.) So...now the city (read Police Department) is to be held liable for injury sustained not only during the commision of a pursuit...but now after a pursuit has been terminated.
In effect then, all one has to do is accelerate, at the first sign of rotating/flashing red lights in ones rear view mirror, and the judicious police officer will immediately break off pursuit...before it even really happens.
C.) The lunatics truly are now running the asylum.
|
Well, as to A) they can hold both liable, especially if the cops are pursuing some penniless crack addict. It's not likethe guy who got hit is gonna collect any money from the suspects in that case.