Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
Jim Hoffman's argument is in opposition to the idea that there is any reason to suspect that the official descritption of the four hijacked 9/11 airliners were two 767's that crashed into the WTC towers, and two 757's' flights 77 and 93....
I posted his argument and the wrecked jet engine on Murray St., NYC photo links of the man who Jim Hoffman is challenging, Morgan Reynolds.
If I was Jim Hoffman, the most convincing way to rebut Morgan Reynold's contentions would be to dispute the authenticity of the Murray St. wrecked jet engine core photos. Jim Hoffman does not do that!
The only reason that the Jim Hoffman linked quote box is in my post is to make the point that the photos are authentic. The photos are vital to my argument. I anticipated that they might be challenged as a hoax. I hope this post will prompt you to reevaluate my argument and the photo evidence and contrasts.
|
ok then. if they are or are not a hoax is truely irelevent, there is video footage of the first and second planes, and they are both clearly 767's, either the picture is a hoax and was placed (unlikely) or it is the engin from teh 767 bashed up. the size argument holds no water, the plane was a 767, there is no question of that.
here is a great debunking of the no plane or smaller plane theory:
http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/767orwhatzit.html