Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - Unanswered Questions Surrounding Terrorist Attacks

dksuddeth · 05-03-2006, 11:03 AM

1) the WTC towers WERE designed to take a 707 hit, but the design was meant to keep it from tumbling down from the direction of the hit, hence the strong inner columns

2) jazz is dead spot on about the flash point and flames, also consider what the wind conditions were like that high up and all the furniture and other flammable materials up there.

3) I still have digital media of the towers crashing down. The given explanation of the top weight crushing the towers straight down is the most plausible theory there is. While a timed and sequenced detonation theory is possible, it's not very probable. Where would all these charges have been placed, when could they have been placed in there, and who would not have noticed any of that going on?

05-03-2006, 11:03 AM	#17 (permalink)
dksuddeth Junkie Location: bedford, tx	1) the WTC towers WERE designed to take a 707 hit, but the design was meant to keep it from tumbling down from the direction of the hit, hence the strong inner columns 2) jazz is dead spot on about the flash point and flames, also consider what the wind conditions were like that high up and all the furniture and other flammable materials up there. 3) I still have digital media of the towers crashing down. The given explanation of the top weight crushing the towers straight down is the most plausible theory there is. While a timed and sequenced detonation theory is possible, it's not very probable. Where would all these charges have been placed, when could they have been placed in there, and who would not have noticed any of that going on? __________________ "no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."