shakran

Closemindedness my foot. Crossova is wrong. Period. He's guilty of what so many conspiracy fans are guilty of. They hear about some wild conspiracy that would be REALLY fun if it were true, so they believe it no matter what the evidence against it is.

Crossova has thusfar failed to answer the key question that should be posed about any conspiracy theory. WHY.

Why would anyone want to lie about an airplane hitting the pentagon instead of a truck bomb blowing up next to the pentagon. Whether it was a plane or a truck, the damage was done, and it was done by the same group. There's no advantage to making up information about an airplane hitting the pentagon, especially when 2 other airplanes are confirmed to have hit New York and another is confirmed through CVR to have been hijacked before it crashed. 3 airplanes used to attack the US are bad enough. Why do we need to lie to invent a fourth?

Plus, the height Crossova used for the Boeing is wrong. It's 44 feet from the ground to the tip of the tail. That's a hangar clearance height. The height from the ground to the top of the fuselage is 13.5 feet. That's much closer to the height of that hole. The tail is basically aluminum skin, with comparitively little weight. Up against hardened concrete, it most likely WOULD disintegrate.


Additionally, if the airplane really didn't hit the pentagon, then I would think American Airlines would be very interested because they presumably would want their airplane back. Someone stole it and hid it away somewhere. In other words, the airplane is missing. Where is it, if it didn't hit the Pentagon?