Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tecoyah
Yes...I am. Though I fail to see what that accurate statement (in my opinion) has to do with my post. If you fail to see the intent I will Clarify for you:
The OP draws a correlation between Mr. Clintons social programs and Poverty around the Library honoring him.
My post attempted to place context on the assumed tie between said social programs and abject Poverty throughout this country, by placing the preceding presidents library in the same light. That you decided to go off tangent is not a suprise, but it does no service to the discussion.
|
Actually I'd think the OP's point was to highlight the hypocrisy of liberals
The democratic leadership doesn't CARE if people are poor, they only care to have poor people voting for them. Eliminating poverty is not a real issue for either party, but exploiting it is for the democrats.
If eliminating poverty was something really important to them, you would think that things like school vouchers allowing the poor to attend better schools wouldn’t be subject to automatic rejection due to the teachers union financial interests.