View Single Post
Old 03-06-2006, 08:18 AM   #17 (permalink)
Jinn
Lover - Protector - Teacher
 
Jinn's Avatar
 
Location: Seattle, WA
While I cannot speak for the poster above who said that email alone cannot hurt you, they are semantically correct -- Plain Text EMails cannot harm your computer.

I understand that you may have read about exploits in Outlook or Internet Explorer, but I must say again; plaintext emails cannot have executable code contained within, and can therefore NOT harm your computer in any way-shape-or-form.

In the same way that reading my post cannot harm your computer in any way, neither can reading plaintext email. The "exploits" you're talking about are because Microsoft chooses to allow certain emails to imbed HTML and executable content, not because email is inherently insecure. By shoehorning "web" features into an email client like Outlook, Microsoft allows for the possibility of imbedded (and likely malicious) executable code. If you were, for example, to view the email in a viewer like Thunderbird (http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/) or a web-viewer with HTML disabled, such as Gmail (www.gmail.com), you would find that these "exploits" were nonexistant.

You may even have known what I just said, but chose to omit it from your post. I think it's far more friendly to provide a workaround solution than to chastise someone for doing something, and warning them not to do it in the future. In this case, you can open any damn email you want as long as you use a non-"dynamic" viewer.. one that does not support imbedding or HTML formatting instructions. If you're going to get in a huff and warn everyone about the latest "WARNING WARNING VIRUS" news release you read, you might want to educate yourself and others on the TRUE ramifications before crying wolf.
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel

Last edited by Jinn; 03-06-2006 at 08:24 AM..
Jinn is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360