It was only a matter of time for them to implement an algorithm llike this. My thought is that if you are getting a fair share, you're getting a fair share, what is that fair share? I dunno, but I think that 13 movies for $17.99 is quite the bargain. Yes, it's not 22 for $17.99 but I guarantee you that the tracking backend system that pays out the royalties for the movies as they are rented out show that it's not possible for them to sustain an all you can eat model without having it be at a higher price point. They wanted to have the price point higher but competitors forced them to keep it lower.
I'd rather they keep the price higher and give people more movies faster... let it be the US Postal service be the bottleneck.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|