Quote:
Originally Posted by meembo
That is a remarkable assertion. I don't know you, but your confidence in your ability to ignore distractions on a dime sounds superhuman! I'm glad you try to limit your attention to the call, but I assert that the simple act of answering calls while driving is the first in a chain of distractions during the call that endanger you and others. By the time you realize the call needs to be dropped in order to pay attention to the road, your reaction time to hazards has slowed considerably already. In the same way a drunk driver can't accurately judge his abilities because of his impairment, a chatting driver with divided attention can't judge to the best of his ability when to "refocus" on the road.
I fundamentally disagree with you that the issue is "training and awareness". No amount of training removes the threat of distractions while driving. The issue is distraction, whether it is in the form of a child or a hamburger or a phone call. I don't see how it's possible to advocate awareness and defend cell phone calls while driving. The reduction of cell phones and other distractions to the driver is precisely the issue.
|
I think
shakran has an excellent point.
Yes, we must ensure that our drivers are competent to drive but there must always be leeway. For instance, I would never drive a vehicle after having a drink of any kind, I don't care what my blood alcohol is. However, your alcohol blood level can be surprisingly high before you are legally barred from driving. Yet, you think any kind of conversation in your car warrants keeping you off the road. I mean, really... If we tolerate the consumption of
alcohol while driving, there must be some tolerance with cell phone use, or
conversation, right?
If your handling of the car is unobstructed (such as using a headset), then driving while on the phone is really no different than conversing with a passenger. If you're careful or properly trained then why not drive while conversing? We can't legislate every little detail of life...