Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
How in the world was anyone denied their rights in this situation?
|
the law abiding peaceful employees weren't armed because of policy, but that didn't seem to matter to the person that comitted the crime, did it? Had these people been allowed to practice their rights to bear arms, maybe the only person dead would be the one that had the intent on holding a massacre.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
Are you seriously advocating that everyone should be allowed to go to work armed and that businesses should have no right to deny access to armed individuals? Anyone in a customer service job would probably disagree with you pretty vehemintly.
|
Are those companies that prohibit an employee from carrying a weapon responsible for the employees life in the event that an armed individual with intent to maim or murder enters the premises? My guess is that they would not be held liable and any individual that dies as a result of the criminal not caring if they obeyed law/policy/whatever died because they were prevented from providing for their own self defense.