pan6467

That's up to you.

I do respect you Politico and always have because you are fair.

But I was trying to point out how you took part of my post added to it your own meaning and blew off the rest.

And yes, if you are defending Bush's policy on border protection then it is a difference in philosophies.

Mine is that you cannot claim that you are doing everything possible to protect the country if you leave the borders wide open.

I firmly believe that it puts everything else you are doing as window dressing and BS.

You're tapping the phones, the pentagon is spying on us and we are expected to give up rights and freedoms...... but we'll leave the borders alone and keep allowing 10's of thousands to come over illegally.....

Does that make any sense to you or to any Bush supporter whatsoever? Because that philosophy and whatever you deem it makes no sense to me.

When the attack comes and it is deemed an illegal..... are you still going to believe that Bush did all he could? Knowing that he left our borders wide open?

I don't see how anyone can. And I would like explained to me how you can.

__________________
I just love people who use the excuse "I use/do this because I LOVE the feeling/joy/happiness it brings me" and expect you to be ok with that as you watch them destroy their life blindly following. My response is, "I like to put forks in an eletrical socket, just LOVE that feeling, can't ever get enough of it, so will you let me put this copper fork in that electric socket?"