Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
By the way Mr. O'Rights, I was not baiting. I was simply insisting that, if someone's gonna launch an attack, he must be able to back it up. Because Ustwo was not able to back it up, his attack is now invalidated. Simple debate tactic, not baiting.
|
From what I have observed, a recent tactic you have developed is to call someone who disagrees with you a liar. Without being able to back it up.
This resulted in one thread being closed, and I assume the same thing will happen to this one very soon.
It would be nice to see substantial logic and reasoning leading up to a "liar!" accusation.
What would be even nicer would be not to see that label flung around at all, especially without reason.