Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudel73
Sorry, I have not seen the movie. I have absolutely no desire to watch a movie based on the relationships of gay cowboys. That is not what I would call "entertaining". This is not the type of movie I would ever see in the first place, not at all. I enjoy movies that are funny and entertaining, not ones that are artistic and political.
|
Brokeback Mountain isn't political. It deals with non-mainstream sexuality, which is sometimes made into a political issue, but that doesn't mean that anything having to do with homosexuality is necessarily political.
I'm a lesbian, I really have no interest in man-on-man sex. It's fortunate, then, that that's not what this movie is about. The sex isn't gratuitous or even very graphic, and constitutes maybe two minutes of a two hour film.
It's about being who you are in the face of adversity, about finding something in yourself that you didn't know was there.
Quote:
Whatever virtues it talks about, I really don't care, it's a chick flick.
|
I gotta disagree. I am an afficianado of chick flicks. I have
Where the Heart Is on dvd and I've seen it a half dozen times. This isn't a chick flick. Nowhere near the formula.
Quote:
I don't learn my virtues or values by what I see on a theater screen, the virtue of any movie is moot as long as it has some entertaining value.
|
I think you mean morals here, and I don't really disagree with you. I think movies can help you to empathize with people you'd never otherwise have the opportunity with which to interact, and thus can help you to vicariously develop the ability to empathize with others, but it probably does require a receptive mind to have that effect.
Quote:
Watching man on man sex is not entertaining.
|
You know, I really couldn't agree more with the sentiment, though your wording could use some work. Sure, it's obvious that you're expressing an opinion based on the cocept of what is or isn't entertaining being entirely subjective, but it can be a bit off-putting to present your opinion as a statement of fact. Try softening it with an "I" statement and you're less likely to provoke offense.
Any sex involving a man in any way is something I don't want to be a part of. A loving relationship based on trust, however, is. Brokeback Mountain--and I'm absolutley serious here--has more in common with Romeo and Juliet than it does with gay porn.
Quote:
If I wanted an enthralling, well thought out plot that requires "thinking", i'd go read a book. If I wanted entertainment for a few hours i'd go watch a movie.
I'm sorry if I dont agree with your opinions of this movie, even if I haven't seen it. I have no desire to watch a lovestory with gay cowboys.
|
And you know what? That's cool. That it isn't to your taste is a good reason for not seeing a movie. I like Chow Yun Fat gun fu movies with the good guys and bad guys firing thousands of rounds at each other and racking up a body count in the hundreds. My wife thinks they're stupid beyond belief. She doesn't, however, go out her way to criticize movies she hasn't seen, she just doesn't see them.
However, I would point out that one can be entertained and challenged at the same time. It's possible to like both
The Iron Ladies (the true story of a transvestite volleyball team that won the 1996 Thai national championships; an unambitious formula sports movie) and something more thoughtful like
Brokeback Mountain.
You don't want to see it? That's cool. But criticizing it without having seen it is arguing from a position of ignorance.
Gilda