|
After reading that, I expect his next novel to be a defense of Intelligent Design. As discussed above, his definition of "proof" seems to be extreme, and he would also say that evolution is not "proven" either. It is nearly impossible to prove with 100% certainty any causality; that doesn't mean that there isn't sufficient evidence to draw a conclusion and act accordingly.
(I am an environmental engineer, but I am not a "green".)
__________________
I can't read your signature. Sorry.
|