Great observation...Rekna...
especially considering the length of the Ken Starr investigation and the other investigations. Add the Richard Mellon Scaife financed investigation and anti Clinton campaign...called the Arkansa Project and the highly partisan republican house majority that voted for impeachment and then tried Clinton in the senate....and do not forget the Dan Burton led chinagate investigation report.... and the anti Clinton folks will still claim that Clinton was too slick or that he was somehow protected. These folks are convinced that Clinton was not fully investigated. Their belief system is based on points of fact determined by rules that exist in their own parallel universe. Their seperate perception works for them when they talk among themselves.
It does not function so well when it is confronted by a question like the one you ask. They will probably answer that Clinton is in possession of powers so evil that no force of righteous repubkicans could bring any indictment against him. A lack of indictments is just more proof of his unprecedented criminality....not less proof...as you and I would suppose....
|