Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv
.....If you do any research, you will find that other governments enter the name of any discovered agent into their databases, to determine who interacted with them. This was done with Plame ten years ago, so the whole world DID know. And where in the heck do you get your "attempt to destroy a persons livelyhood" (sic)? The whole question came up because some people (it's still being decided as to whom) were trying to figure out how Wilson was selected to investigate the Niger-uranium question. Wilson's "livelyhood" wasn't based on merit, but on nepotism............
|
Marv, you ignored my last post....presumably because the contents of it reduced your argument above to what it truly is....Rove/Libby/Cheney BS.....unsubstantiated.....found to have no merit by a three judge, federal circuit court appellant panel....in the Plame leak case,,,,the case that we are discussing here.
The fact that repub. shill Toensing advanced your argument....your Bill Gertz article.....to the court...with no accompanying sworn affidavits....not even one from "reporter" Gertz, himself, was already pointed out to you, and you ignore it and repeat the same, unsubstantiated misinformation, according to Gertz, from "unidentified" CIA sources, shows that you might not have anything else of substance to back you up.
Again, Marv....your "other governments enter the name of any discovered agent into their databases....this was done with Plame ten year ago....."
is unsubstantiated. No other "news" organization, other than the highly suspect Washington Times, carried Gertz's "story", that your cited. A federal appeals court was not swayed by it, in the least, They did not even mention considering it in their ruling that mandated jail time for Cooper and Miller.
Toensing could not even supply a sworn affidavit, attesting to it's accuracy, from Gertz himself, in the brief to the court that cited the "story" as evidence.
The bar here is raised, Marv. Rise up to it's level and stop repeating arguments that have already been unmasked as crap, or defend them with facts that others can examine for themselves, like I (and others here) regularly do......