View Single Post
Old 10-19-2005, 08:34 AM   #10 (permalink)
Cross-Over
Psycho
 
Cross-Over's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alansmithee
...I honestly think the team to beat is the Nuggets. Karl had them playing really well last year, and I think they will just get better. Either them or Houston, I think the West representative will be either one of those two.
The Nuggets played well under Karl, but that wasn't for the whole season. All that hype about them upsetting someone in the playoffs after taking game 1 against the Spurs was squashed when S.A. swept the next four. The nuggets only made one improvement, adding Earl Watson. I like Watson, and was glad to see if get the full mid-level exception, but his presence is going to take away minutes from their other core group of guards (Boykins and Miller and the point, Johnson and Leonard at the two). Playing Miller at the two will work, but he is not nearly the shooting threat that Leonard or even Johnson is. Miller has no three point range whatsoever, he is a mid range jumper guy. I think they will be a playoff team, but so will 7 other teams in the West

Like maximusveritas stated, the Spurs are clearly the team to beat. The best team in the NBA added depth in the sole area they needed it, three point shooting. Finley has shot over 40% from three-point range the last two years. Hopefully that number wont drop significantly, e.g., Brent Barry. Many people chose the popular pick of the Suns to win it all in the playoff predictions thread last year, but their weakness was exposed. They couldn't play any defense, Parker and Ginobili scored at will. The defensive minded Spurs eliminated one of their weapons by rendering Marion useless.

I am a Washington and Atlanta fan. I liked that the Hawks got Joe Johnson (who needs draft picks, they haven't worked for them up until last year anyways), but they have no inside presence. Looks like another lottery year.
The Wizards pissed me off incredibly by being stingy with Hughes. They did eventually match the Cav's offer, but Hughes already felt disrespected and went with the Cavs. I don't blame him, the guy had a great year (led the league in steals, All Defensive First Team), yet they lowball him on their initial offer. I think Antonio Daniels is a good fit and an efficient player, but he is older and less of a weapon than Hughes. They let good players go away right as they enter their prime (Chris Webber, Rip Hamilton, Ben Wallace, Rasheed Wallace).
Cross-Over is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360