View Single Post
Old 10-06-2005, 08:33 AM   #28 (permalink)
stevo
Rail Baron
 
stevo's Avatar
 
Location: Tallyfla
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carn
Um, who ever said that the military would be "completely compliant?" Looking back at history, there was almost never a case of someone taking power without a civil war.

Hell, I don't think Bush could take over the US, but if the laws are in place, what's to keep some future dipshit president from trying it?

History is a fucking textbook. Learn from it. It's shit like this that makes me so mad. You think it could never happen now, but I'm sure that a lot of people in the past thought it couldn't happen in their country either. Slowly but surely, the government is chipping away. Little increases here, little decreases there, small enough so that nobody will notice.

Yeah sure Bush could change the laws and say that the military would only be used in the event of a disease. But what exactly is stopping a president from declaring martial law when there wasn't a disease? Bush invaded two countries based on lies, for God's sake. Get a clue people.
So lets declare an official threadjack.

Now please list the two (2) countries that were invaded based on lies.

------------
Ok, charlatan, I'll cut the rookie some slack. You know how my moodswings are, I get pissy then happy, then just don't care. If it weren't for these hot-flashes....

------------

Seriously though, If marshal law was able to contain the outbreak, that would be great. But I've got concerns as well that it would probably spread to several cities before any action would take place. Sure, the first reports would be in Detroit, marshal law is declared, Detroid is quarantiened. But before the first day is over reports would be coming from Chicago, Philadelphia, and Kansas City. You know how it goes. But I agree with Charlatan on this one 100%, if there was an outbreak of a killer flu, marshal law and bush becoming supreme dictator is the last of your worries.

-----------
One more thing...So tech, FEMA is now capeable of controlling this, and isn't the nat'l guard military? and I know the difference, but it would make sense to me to have centralized government controlling the situation that state governers. like I said, if it hits one city, it will be in many states.
__________________
"If I am such a genius why am I drunk, lost in the desert, with a bullet in my ass?" -Otto Mannkusser
stevo is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360