View Single Post
Old 09-30-2005, 03:33 AM   #6 (permalink)
Sty
Patron
 
Sty's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Tôkyô, Japan
Well, I would still go for Athlon64 3500+, it being in the perfect price/performance slot. Check the Anand's newest single-core performance measurements:

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2429

What seems to my eye there that AMD is leading quite nicely where it matters. I tend to ignore the synthetic benchmarks because it's been proven many times that they have little or no relevance to real life.

So on those non-synthetic benchmarks that P4 leads, it has at most 1-3% speed advantage on similary priced Athlon. On those that Athlon leads, it has usually 5-15%+ lead. Go AMD.

Also, if you want to go dualcore later on AMD, you just update the BIOS. With intel, it's a MB change for you. Also, if you check the new Intel roadmaps, there's another huge phaseout before the next-gen processors come out (meron & co.).

AMD is a no-brainer if you want performance and more security on your already poor investment
__________________
br,
Sty

I route, therefore you exist
Sty is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46