Quote:
Originally Posted by tecoyah
One also is forced to wonder how you would deal with your Mother in prison....unjustly, having fallen victim to the "other 25%".
I would be interested in your thoughts on this scenario Alan.
|
It would be no different. I would be disappointed and probably angry for awhile, but it wouldn't invalidate what I believe to be right. Just because it's someone related to me changes nothing. I'm not so conceited that I think it's fine for everyone else BUT me, I realize that I would be just as likely as the next person to suffer.
Also, the exact circumstances would matter in this case. There's a difference between just randomly charging/convicting people, and charging/convicting those who there is evidence in support of their wrongdoing, evidence which gives a false impression.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
I could be wrong, but it seems to me that Alan is all for a governmental crackdown on society, so long as his rights and liberties are protected. How would he feel if the injustice was forced upon him though?
|
I addressed this somewhat above. Although I would gladly forfeit certain rights of mine if it would lead toward more gov't power. There are many things that I am allowed to do that I think ideally people shouldnt' be allowed to do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pigglet
Well, the thing that I keep thinking about is that these scenarios have been played out countless times throughout history, and every time a society gets all ape-shit totalitarian, corruption spreads like wild fire, the people get super pissed off, and they kick the shit out of the government.
So the real question I'm left with is whether alansmithee is serious in his positions, or whether he's trying to be incendiary?
Oh what the heck, one last question: If the government is justified in throwing people in prison if they think they're bad guys, or if they might be bad guys, etc...do you expect the people of accused of being bad guys to sit back and take it...or do you expect them to say "the heck with this crap, I think I'm going to get a little revolution going on?"
Let's say this
"More than 5.6 million Americans are in prison or have served time there, according to a new report by the Justice Department released Sunday. That's 1 in 37 adults living in the United States, the highest incarceration level in the world...If current trends continue, it means that a black male in the United States would have about a 1 in 3 chance of going to prison during his lifetime. For a Hispanic male, it's 1 in 6; for a white male, 1 in 17."
Then, if 25% of 5.6 million is 1.4 million (which it is)...then you're saying you're fine with about 1.4 million people being in prison incorrectly (assumiing that 5.6 million deserve to be there in the first place) and don't think that's going to cause any problems? I've detected that you have some issues with the partiality of the legal system towards convicted black people...you don't think that an incarceration rate of 25% more blacks in prison, fully in the knowledge that there's a ton of false convictions is going to cause massive problems?
Hmmm....
edit It might be interesting to juxtapose this position with the fact that (in my opinion) we're justifiably freaking out as a nation over somewhere from a hundred to a couple thousand potentially dead in New Orleans, and the potential "sluggishness" of our government to deal fairly and adequately with the people there. I think, and I could be wrong, but I *think* that people in the U.S. would get so crazy with the cheeze whiz it would make Detroit after a Red Wings Stanley Cup look like an upset child knocking over a house of cards.
double edit alan maybe you're trying to claim you're happy with the status quo, in that we assuredly have false convictions already?
|
No, the people shouldn't revolt because it's in their own best interest. Sure, some bear the brunt of being "wronged", but this happenes in society everyday, it's nnothing new.
And you are right I do have issues with how Blacks are treated in the justice system. But what I'd like to see isn't a lessening of that (mainly because I think it is near impossible) but other races treated more like blacks. Again, it might cause problems having a great deal of false convictions, but I don't think much more than what you see now. And being falsely convicted doesn't mean that you can't be freed at a later date (much like what happens now).
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinguerre
Never said you did. I was explaining to djtestudo why i beleived that there was very little reaction to your statements. I mean provocative only in relation to other view points here. Most liberals here don't like the idea of a police state, or trust the government that much right now. Your statements clearly conflict with that value set. Many of the conservatives here are liberatarian, which again clearly conflicts with your statements.
Openly declaring that you believe that less freedom is a good thing is clearly meant to garner a response. Do i really need to be saying any of this? It seems rather straightforward to me.
|
Umm, if I understand it, the second part of dj testudo's comments were about Bush and not me. AFAIK, nobody's given me the power to jail suspected terrorists (although I'd greatly appreciate it if I were given those powers).
Because I think my statements have gotten quite a bit of reaction (deserved or not)