The point of the NPT is to prevent additional countries from acquiring nuclear weapons. The treaty has succeeded in slowing down the nuclear progress of a host of countries including North Korea. As for the future, the NPT will be useful in preventing regimes in eastern Europe and Africa from getting nuclear weapons.
Yeah, we invaded Iraq "instead" of North Korea, but that also had to do with the fact that NK's conventional army was far, far more powerful than Iraq's. Yeah, we give aid to Israel despite the fact that they have nukes, haven't signed the NPT, but we all know that Israel is a very unique case in many ways.
As for India, don't you think it makes sense to negociate with them seeing as they will continue to have nuclear weapons regardless of whether or not we are on good terms with them? Anyone with nukes is a good ally and a terrible enemy!
__________________
The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
|