Quote:
Just a few reasons why Wilson is a sleazeball
|
i dunno, powerclown: maybe i mistunderstood the above sentence and the entire argument outlined in what you posted after that and took it as an attack on wilson.
surely you will indulge me this misunderstanding, which i got from reading what you posted--but now i am confused--if articles entirely about his credibility are not in fact about his credibility, then what are they about?
if it is something else entiely, you really ought to post a deciphering link so that the rest of us can participate in that special zone of language the right has created for itself. if the statement "wilson is a sleazeball" should be read by picking every 4th letter and then working out an acrostic, you should warn us so that we dont get confused.
but let's assume that your post is not in fact in somekind of private code.....i dont see where wilson's personal credibility or the accuracy of statements he made about the uranium purchase charade in niger are relevant. particularly since a few days ago i remember you towing the line of the moment that this was all old news...suddenly, you are shifting gears and speaking in tongues. interesting stuff.
i now that this attack the critic game can make all kinds of shit appear relevant in the vast cesspit that is rightwing attack politics....but logically, it isnt..... so either a decoder ring of some type (or its equivalent), or an explanation of your point in posting that material please....?